<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Red Recondite &#187; Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/category/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog</link>
	<description>Red Recondite is slumber with a plunger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Max Payne Blog Spam: Investigative Report</title>
		<link>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/10/20/max-payne-blog-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/10/20/max-payne-blog-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting.
A &#8216;movie fan&#8217; posted a comment to my Awesome Max Payne Review.  I was suspicious, because, let&#8217;s be honest here, this blog isn&#8217;t exactly high-caliber reading material, despite the eloquence of that particular review.
I searched for his comment in good ol&#8217; google, and it looks like the same text, &#8220;i suspect the storyline for Max [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>A &#8216;movie fan&#8217; posted a comment to my <a href="http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/10/19/review-max-payne-movie/">Awesome Max Payne Review</a>.  I was suspicious, because, let&#8217;s be honest here, this blog isn&#8217;t exactly high-caliber reading material, despite the eloquence of that particular review.</p>
<p>I searched for his comment in good ol&#8217; google, and it looks like the same text, &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=&quot;i+suspect+the+storyline+for+Max+Payne+is+a+lot+more+exciting+when+it’s+happening+in+the+form+of+a+video+game&quot;&amp;filter=0">i suspect the storyline for Max Payne is a lot more exciting when it’s happening in the form of a video game…</a>&#8220;, has been posted everywhere else, with minor variations.</p>
<p>Looking at movie fan&#8217;s link, <a href="http://www.kogmedia.com/">Kingdom of God Media</a>, and the typical motivation for blog spam simply isn&#8217;t there: there is no money to be made.</p>
<ol>
<li>There are no ads.</li>
<li>He has a donate link, but I have difficulty imagining that gets much action.</li>
<li>He does link to an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Church-As-Know-Christ-World/dp/1419663763/">Amazon.com page selling a book he wrote</a>, but that&#8217;s only on his other blog, <a href="http://www.booksbypatrick.com/">Books By Patrick</a>.</li>
</ol>
<p>And, true to its tag line, &#8220;<span>The Mysteries of God&#8217;s Kingdom Revealed Through Movies, Music and Television&#8221;, it does interpret movies, music, and television with a religious frame, but not a &#8216;convert the heathens&#8217; frame.<br />
</span></p>
<p>So, why?  Why, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/02397839550090715753">Mr. Patrick Roberts</a>, why do you post the same comment everywhere?  It is not a bad comment, sure, but what do you have to gain from it?</p>
<p>By process of elimination, or perhaps by process of lack of imagination, I&#8217;m only left with &#8217;self promotion&#8217;.  At the very bottom of his blog, there are several links to &#8216;blogtoplist&#8217;, &#8216;blogtoparea&#8217;, and other such blog-ranking web sites.  By posting the same comment to multiple web sites, he is probably google-bombing his blog to a higher ranking.</p>
<p>And, because of the very minor variations in the comment, and the fact that my anti-spam filter did not flag it, I am under the assumption that he went to each site and posted the comments himself, without the aid of a spam bot.</p>
<p>So, I wondered how he found my eloquent review.  While my review is perhaps the lowest ranked item in a standard <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=max payne review">Google Search</a>, it is in the first few dozen hits for <a href="http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?q=max+payne+review">Google Blog Search</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/10/20/max-payne-blog-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Purpose</title>
		<link>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/01/25/purpose/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/01/25/purpose/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Red Recondite is slumber with a plunger.
Note that there are a few old entries, which are short stories I wrote a few years ago.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red Recondite is slumber with a plunger.</p>
<p>Note that there are a few old entries, which are short stories I wrote a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redrecondite.com/blog/2008/01/25/purpose/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
